logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고단1986
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. From around 08:00 on April 21, 2019 to around 09:35 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business for about one hour and thirty-five minutes, including, under the influence of alcohol, the victim’s D restaurant operated in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim’s restaurant business for about one hour and thirty-five minutes.

2. On June 1, 2019, at around 20:20, the Defendant used “F Publication Board” in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the obstruction of performance of official duties, to enter the Hhoe room, which is not the Ghoe room used by the Defendant, and called for 112 after receiving a report, and expressed his desire to return to the Defendant’s room, which is the police officer belonging to the Seoul, Pyeongtaek Police Station I District, Seoul, and requested K to return to the Defendant’s room, and continuously pushed the Defendant’s chest, and continuously pushed the K’s chest into his breast by hand, pushed the Defendant’s chest by hand, and selling the Defendant’s breast in his arms. During the process of arresting the Defendant as an offender in the obstruction of official duties, the Defendant assaulted the police officers, such as K, to walk the Defendant’s back to the police officer, while walking the Defendant’s back to the front body.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offender.

3. Defluence;

A. On April 21, 2019, the Defendant, at the same date and time as indicated in paragraph (1), and at a place as indicated in paragraph (1), expressed the victim LA, a police officer, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 on the content of “acting disturbance by a frighter,” to the extent that the victim’s fright, who was a police officer, took place, expressed that “at least a large number of customers, frighten fright, is a police officer,” and that “the fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright, is a police officer.” The Defendant

나. 2019. 6. 1. 범행 피고인은 제2항 기재와 같은 일시, 장소에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관인 피해자 K, J에게 그곳 고시원 총무인 M 등이 있는 가운데 "이 똥깔보 같은 개새끼들아, 돈만 주면 마누라도 대주는...

arrow