logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.03.26 2019고합1035
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for five years and for six years, respectively.

Nos. 1 to 21 of each philopon, seized.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendants were not the authorized person handling narcotics, the Defendants dealt with the psychotropic drugs-related Mesofts (one philophone; hereinafter “philophones”) as follows:

The Defendants conspired to import philophones into the Republic of Korea using nameless boxes (hereinafter “C”), and international mail, and conspired to import philophones into the Republic of Korea by international mail, and if the said C sent philophones to the Republic of Korea using international mail, Defendant A received the said mail in several ways before arrival in the Republic of Korea, and Defendant B received the said mail in a hotel near the veterinary purpose before arrival in the Republic of Korea, and Defendant B received the said mail from A and kept the said mail until the said C takes charge of the following instructions.

Pursuant to the above public offering, the name-dissected person in receipt of C’s instructions reached the Incheon International Public Port located in Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government on November 28, 2019. Defendant A received the said mail from his hotel on December 15, 2019, which was concealed in the instant H building parking lot in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul, where the purpose of this public offering was on December 15, 2019. Defendant A received the said mail from his hotel on December 16, 2014, which was concealed in the above public parking lot in the middle-gu, Seoul, Seoul, where the said mail was stored in a coffee box, and was saved in a normal coffee box. Defendant A received the said mail from his hotel around 16:20 on December 16, 2014.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with C, etc. to import approximately 4,978.12 grams in the United States.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Part of the prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants is written on 1.

arrow