logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.03.18 2014구합101636
위반차량 운행정지 등 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s order to reinstate the vehicle indicated in attached Form 1, which the Plaintiff rendered on May 1, 2014, shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 30, 2007, Gyeonggi Roster Co., Ltd. transferred trucking transport business using a trucking bridge installed at Aptension type. On May 21, 2007, the Navy substituted the above vehicle, which is a special truck for special work, with a general truck (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. The Plaintiff, who is a trucking transport business entity (the Plaintiff, on October 12, 2010, registered the trade name of which was changed from the “Yanananan Korea Transportation Corporation,” to the “New Korea Transportation Corporation”), took over the trucking transport business along with the instant vehicle from the seamen, and the Defendant accepted the report on the transfer and acquisition on May 25, 2007.

C. On February 29, 2008, the Plaintiff re-vehicleed the instant vehicle with the general type truck (carcar truck and B) as indicated in attached Table 1.

Article 3 (3) of the Trucking Transport Business Act (in a case where permission for alteration has been obtained in an unlawful manner pursuant to Article 3 (3) (the permission for alteration of the type of permission (in a case of scrapping of cars, etc.), after obtaining permission for special work styles), the details of the disposition 60 days (B) of the suspension of business - Acts and subordinate statutes on the basis of restitution of illegally registered cars (special work pressure-type type portable legs) - Article 16 (4) - Article 19 (1) 2 of the Trucking Transport Business Act

D. On September 11, 2013, the Defendant issued a prior notice of disposition to the Plaintiff, along with the details of the transfer and acquisition of an illegally registered vehicle on the ground of the instant scrapping of the instant vehicle.

E. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant issued the Plaintiff a disposition to “30 days to stop the operation of the violating vehicle” (hereinafter “instant disposition to stop the operation of the instant vehicle”) with respect to the restoration order (hereinafter “instant restoration order”) and the vehicles listed in attached Form 1 as follows.

violation.

arrow