1. Defendant B’s partnership: 5% per annum from February 9, 2018 to January 23, 2019, respectively, to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with the insurance coverage period from November 27, 2015 to November 27, 2016 with respect to D and ENAS vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”). Defendant B association (hereinafter “Defendant B association”) is a mutual aid business entity who has entered into an automobile mutual aid agreement with the Plaintiff in relation to the vehicle of Gyststet (hereinafter “Defendant 1”). Defendant C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Defendant insurance company”) is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff in relation to H and I convention vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

B. On September 3, 2016, at around 04:56, J: (a) driven Defendant 1’s vehicle and stopped on the said expressway at the end of the port to the end of the port of port on the side of the port of port on the grounds that it could not be known that, at the end of the port of port, Defendant 1 did not find out the U.S. vehicle, which was installed on the left side of the port of port at the end of the port of port to the end of the port of port; and (b) thereafter, H stopped stopped over 1,2 lanes at the point of 51 km in the direction of the port of the above expressway (hereinafter “1 accident”); and (c) around 13:09, around 13 minutes from the first accident, around 205:09, while stopping the said expressway from the port of port to the port of port of port; and (d) Defendant 1’s vehicle stopped on the rear side of Defendant 2 with the front part of Defendant 1’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

3) Around 05:12 on the same day, D driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle and driving the two-lane on the said expressway at a speed exceeding 146 km per hour from the Daegu bank to the port of port, with the speed of 146 km above that of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and received the front side of the Defendant 1 vehicle located on two-lanes, and Defendant 1 got H due to its shock (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant 1”).