logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.28 2016가합565698
구상금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to the Defendant Han Lan Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., the amount of KRW 47,287,150 and KRW 30,845,50 among them, the amount of KRW 47,287,150.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties is the mutual aid association that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to A high-speed bus owned by them (hereinafter “Plaintiff bus”), and the Defendant Hanhwa Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to automobiles for B and C (hereinafter “Defendant 1”). Defendant Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant 2 Insurance Co., Ltd.”) is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to automobiles for D and EF stations and other automobiles (hereinafter “Defendant 2”), and the Defendant 3 Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant 3”) is the Fsi (hereinafter “Defendant 1”)’s mutual aid association.

B. On September 30, 2015, around 00:10 on September 30, 2015, B (hereinafter “instant primary accident”) driven by Defendant 1, driving his vehicle, driving in one lane among the two lanes in Daegu Busan Busan Metropolitan-do Highway located outside the U.S. C., and driving in one lane among the two lanes in Daegu-do. At a point 45.2km, an animal of a size equivalent to the level of the A.S. self-c. level was expressed in the vicinity of the ChyangIC near the 45.2km, and, in order to avoid this, an accident (hereinafter “instant primary accident”) against the right protection wall on the right side of the proceeding direction.

) After causing the vehicle, part of the road from the side side of the central separation zone (the left side of Defendant 1 was stopped over the side side of the central separation zone, and the remaining part was over the one-lane one lane). 2) The network G driven the Defendant taxi and operated the Defendant taxi over a one-lane between the point where the said accident occurred and the two-lane between the two-lane and the two-lane between the two-lane.

H The driving of the Plaintiff bus along the one-lanes of the two-lanes at the point of the said accident, and the driving of the Defendant taxi on the front side by the two-lanes.

arrow