The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) is that there was no perjury since C testified that he/she had observed that he/she did not occupy E.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, namely, E consistently asserted that there was an injury by assault, such as the case of the 2012 Go-Ma1789 and the case of the 2012 Go-Ma1789 from the Daegu District Court, and the case of the court below, and submitted a statement of injury corresponding thereto, the witness F testified in conformity with the E’s statement in the above court, and C did not appeal the judgment of conviction in the above case, and C did not appeal the judgment of conviction in the above case. G testified testified in the court below as it became final and conclusive, and G testified in the above judgment of the court below as it took full account of the following facts: (a) the testimony was made with C’s physical contact with the E using the above body, such as kneeae and trying to kill in the dub above, and (b) the above defendant did not have an assault in the court of the above case; and (c) the above defendant’s assertion to the purport that the above facts was insufficient.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.