The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, as alleged in the facts charged, found that he had inflicted an injury on the victim by booming the flaps of the victim C by dump, etc.; and (b) the lower court acquitted

2. The lower court determined that: (a) in light of the following: (b) it is difficult to believe that the Defendant’s statement to the effect that, in light of the fact that E did not have seen the dispute between the Defendant and C from the beginning in the lower court’s court, E did not know whether E had been at the scene; and (c) C was unable to accurately make a statement about the point at which E was at the site; (b) C did not consistently state the situation at the time of his fating, degree of damage, etc.; and (c) C did not consistently state the Defendant’s attitude of statement in the lower court’s court’s court and the physical attack much larger than the Defendant; and (c) it is doubtful whether C suffered injury due to the Defendant’s assault; and (c) the situation at the time of the instant case.

F in the court of the court below, as the defendant was her body in the state where her m or her m was entered, and C takes the defendant in the body side of the defendant, and at the time F took off the defendant from the defendant by her h's h's h's removal from the ground, the two h's two h's removal from the defendant was far away from the ground, and the defendant was not considered to have her h's b's h't.

In full view of the facts stated, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor that the facts charged in this case are proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see

In light of the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is justified.