Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 9, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the business was wrong in calculating the price at the “D” entertainment shop operated by the victim C in Gwangju-si around 22:30 on November 9, 2017

The victim's main business was interfered with by force, such as provokinging Si expenses and taking a bath to the victim with a large interest of "the year of flick, the year of flicking," and leaving approximately 30 minutes of the disturbance to the customers.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, place, and 112 reported to the effect that “I am salute without calculating the customers,” and was asked to the above F by the chief F of the police box affiliated with the Gwangju Police Station E box, who was called to ask questions from the police officer F, etc. about the occurrence of the case.

He expressed his desire to "I am, I am, I am only when I am, I am. I am. I am. I am to am. I am to am. I am to the above F, and am to the above F on the stairs. I am to the cellular phone and the wall.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each statement of 112 Report statements to statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the Defendant’s mistake, only two times of fines, and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim to interfere with the affairs, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the overall sentencing conditions indicated in the record.