A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 20, 2015, at around 23:33, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) the victim’s “D cafeteria” in the victim’s management “D cafeteria,” where customers are seated; and (b) the victim’s restaurant business by force, where customers are seated.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in the above paragraph 1, was reported to 112 and sent to the said place, recommended several times by the sloping F belonging to the E District of the Singu Police Station, “I will interfere with the next customers, and return home to home.” However, the Defendant committed assault, i.e., taking a bat of his batf with his hand, and taking a attitude to keep the bats on the bats while pushing the chest, by gathering them into the bats.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in relation to 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. A written statement of C and G;

1. Photographs;

1. The table of work order, the details of report processing under the Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act, as the punishment for concurrent crimes;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment for crimes No. 1 (Interference with Duties) and the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple offenses in the basic area (Interference with Duties), No. 1 (Interference with Duties), the basic area (Interference with Duties), No. 1 (Interference with Duties), No. 2 (Interference with Duties), the basic area (Interference with Duties), No. 1 (Interference with Duties), No. 6 months or 2 months:

2. The fact that the instant crime was committed during the period of suspended execution, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, the background and circumstances leading to the instant crime, etc.