logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.02 2017고단87
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:30 on January 2, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation by taking advantage of approximately 20 minutes’ force, such as “D” in the operation of the Victim C (39 tax) located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. (hereinafter referred to as “D”), “not money, reported to the police,” and “nickly,” and “nickly, reported to the police,” and “nickly,” the victim’s restaurant operation by force.

2. The defendant who has interfered with the performance of official duties is called out at the above date, time, and place at the above 112 report, and is asked to pay the food value after receiving a check from F, a police officer belonging to the police force belonging to the Ulsan Southern Police Station E District Police Station, which identified the reason for the report.

“In doing so, the F’s body f at one time with a bad hand while taking a bath.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the receipt statute

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are crimes 1 [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of the punishment], the basic area of the crimes (from June to one year and six months) (the scope of the recommended punishment] (the scope of the recommended punishment) (the scope of the punishment), the basic area (from June to one year and six months) (the scope of the recommended punishment), and there is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] [the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravated punishment] from June to two years [the extent of damage] from June to three months [the decision of the sentence], and the defendant was punished twice by a fine.

arrow