logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고합156
아동학대범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(아동복지시설종사자등의아동학대)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and a fine of KRW 5,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From November 1, 2011 to November 12, 2014, the Defendant served as a seed-care teacher who takes charge of infants aged between 0 and 1 in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City E Child Care Center from “F Child Care Center” to “F Child Care Center” who is located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

On November 12, 2014, the Defendant, from around 11:00 to around 11:50 of the Victim G G (11 months) 11:50 of F Child Care Center seeds, was placed on a lower shoulder or uler, and the victim’s face towards the floor so that the victim’s face would be covered by the floor, and covered the victim and re-locked the victim, and then locked again, from around 13:12 to about 15 minutes, the two edges of this fright, where the victim’s body is locked, are frightd with one’s her her chill, and the Defendant committed physical abuse and development of the body of the victim, who is a child.

around 12:54 on November 12, 2014, the Defendant, “2016 Gohap 184,” laid down the Victim G (11 month) being taken care of the F Child Care Center C seeds, on the upper end of the chest so that the lower bottom of the chest can lead to the floor of the chest, and carried out locked (68 cm, 82 cm, cm with a thickness of 33 cm) on the upper part of the body, including the victim’s head.

The Defendant had the duty of care to pay the best attention and efforts to maintain and improve the health of the child under protection as child care teachers, and even though the victim was aware that the health conditions are not good compared with other infants, such as eating drugs continuously, the Defendant did not discover that the victim was growing down without any movement due to the failure to continuously observe the state of the victim for about 13:42 to 14:19 on the same day and then failed to observe the state of the victim for about 37 minutes from around 13:42 on the same day.

At around 14:19 on the same day, the defendant is in an urgent state of dispute over the life of the victim, such as not leaving the victim hidden.

arrow