logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.10 2018고단2565
공기호부정사용등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 2018, the Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act: (a) around the residence of the Defendant located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant removed without permission the registration number plate of the vehicle by front of and after the D’s “E” passenger car in the name of the Defendant operated and managed; and (b) removing the number plate using the tools, etc.

2. On February 26, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in paragraph 1 at the end of the horse around the end of February, 2018; (b) at the front and back of the passenger car benz in which the Defendant removed the number plate; (c) attached the F Company’s “G” passenger car benz in front and back; and (d) used the number plate to the I Hospital located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for its operation; and (c) exercised the number plate by the same method from that time to April 26, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of the statement (J);

1. Copy of the G motor vehicle registration certificate, copy of the E certificate of storage, the E motor vehicle registration ledger, the comprehensive details of the vehicle (G, K, E), and the comprehensive details of the vehicle (E);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the surface of on-site photographs, respective photographs, and vehicles illegally used G;

1. Article 81 of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 81 subparagraph 1 and 10 (2) of the Automobile Management Act (Separation of registration number plates and selection of imprisonment), Article 238 (1) of the respective Criminal Act, Article 238 (2) and 238 (1) of the respective Criminal Act (Unlawful use of official marks) of the said Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act appears to have recognized and reflected each of the instant crimes, and there is no record of the same crime.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances: the details of the defendant's commission of crime, health condition, etc., and other detailed conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime

arrow