logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.01.12 2015고단8653
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 08:30 on September 21, 2015, the victim F (n, 50 years old) of the victim F (n, 50 years old) who was the wife in the main room of Busan East-gu E apartment 101 Dongdong-gu, 4904, had a dispute over this church; (b) was faced with the victim by a stringer that was going on the house of the victim; and (c) was facing the candlele of the victim's bridge in the vicinity of the victim's body, and (d) went away with the victim's subsequent to the victim, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the victim's body part 2 degrees, pictures, excluding the images, gals, and gals, of the body part, which requires approximately 6 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. F statement made to the defendant in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the defendant;

112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the 112 Report Processing table, diagnosis certificate, field photograph, and the body photograph of the victim's wife;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution and the defense counsel of the Defendant and the defense counsel asserts that the Defendant did not have the victim’s water as stated in the facts charged, and that the water was injected into the main electronic on the gas straw, and that the victim was injured.

However, the victim F has consistently made statements that correspond to the above criminal facts from investigative agencies to this court. In light of the attitude of the statements in this court and the contents of the statements, the above victim's statements are credibility.

The defendant's assertion that the victim suffered bodily injury on the wind, which is used on the wall side by the main electronic, is not well understood as having been damaged by the victim, considering that the victim suffered a frying image on the wide side, such as the arms, traw, and fry part, etc.

Therefore, the defendant and defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted.

The reason for sentencing is that the injured person is serious.

arrow