beta
Text
1. The defendant C and the Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association
A. Defendant C is the Defendant C on January 2014.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Defendant C is a person who operates the F Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in ASEAN located in ASEAN, and Defendant D is a person who operates the H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in 103 of ASEAN.
B. The Defendant Licensed Real Estate Agent Association concluded a mutual aid agreement with the Defendant C on November 28, 201, and the mutual aid agreement with the Defendant D on November 28, 201, respectively, with a mutual aid company established to guarantee the broker’s liability for damages.
C. On March 29, 2012, Defendant C arranged a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant 301 lease agreement”) with the Plaintiff and the agent of the Plaintiff A regarding 301 (hereinafter “instant 301”) among the 4-story multi-family houses located in the ASEAN-si, Chungcheongnam-si (hereinafter “instant multi-family houses”) located in the ASEAN-si (hereinafter “instant 301”).
1 Lease Period: 2012
3. Deposit deposit from March 31 to March 30, 2013: 55,00,000 won: (1) explain a certified copy of the registry and a statement explaining the confirmation of the object of intermediation, and attach the data thereto; and (2) set forth KRW 276,00,000 (120%) below the certified copy of the registry;
D. At the time of mediating the conclusion of the instant lease agreement by Defendant C, the above part of the register provided to Plaintiff A at the time of mediating the conclusion of the instant lease agreement and the legal relationship column of the confirmation description of the object of brokerage is the column for rights other than ownership.
Only the right of collateral security is written, and the right of the object which has not been disclosed is the public column.
E. Plaintiff A paid 5,00,000 won to I by April 12, 2012 under the instant lease agreement, and continued to reside after filing a resident registration transfer report on April 13, 2012, and maintained the instant lease agreement on subparagraph 301 under the same condition even after the lease agreement term of the instant subparagraph 301 expires, and obtained a fixed date date only on September 26, 2013.
F. Defendant D’s agentJ between Plaintiff B and I on March 23, 2013 is as follows.