1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the following payment order shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this part of the facts of recognition is as follows: (a) except that the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Lease F,” as “Lease Q,” the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) cite

2. Determination

A. One broker, in mediating a lease contract for part of a multi-family house, provides the lessee with data on the legal relationship, etc. of the multi-family house necessary to determine whether the lessee can receive a refund of the deposit due to the termination of the lease contract. Thus, it shall not be limited to confirming and explaining the legal relationship, etc. of the object of brokerage indicated on the real estate register. If the lessee fails to comply with a request for data on the lease deposit, time and termination date, etc. of the object of brokerage indicated on the real estate register, other lessee’s lease agreement already living in a multi-family house, the lessee shall be requested to verify the details of the lease deposit, lease time and termination date, etc., and explain and present them to the lessee. The agent’s duty to provide a document stating the details in the column of “the right of the object of brokerage which has not been verified or publicly announced” on the object of brokerage under Article 16 of the Enforcement Rule of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions.

Therefore, when a broker causes damage to the property of a lessee by intention or negligence, he/she shall be liable to compensate for such damage in accordance with Article 30 of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act.