logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.29 2018나70165
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. 1) In mediating a lease contract for a part of a multi-family house, a licensed real estate agent provides a lessee with data on the relationship of rights, etc. of the multi-family house necessary to determine whether the lessee is able to receive a refund of the lease deposit properly after the lease contract is terminated. Thus, it shall not be limited to confirming and explaining the relationship of rights, etc. of the object of brokerage indicated in the real estate register. The lessee shall request the lessee to provide the data on the deposit for lease, the time of lease and the termination date, etc. except for the personal information of other lessees who already live in the multi-family house and live in the leased house, and then explain and present such data to the lessee. The Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act (hereinafter

(2) Article 30 of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act provides that “The matters concerning the actual relation of rights or the right of an object which has not been disclosed” shall be stated in the column for the object of brokerage in the form prescribed by the Enforcement Rule. If a lessee fails to comply with a request for data on the lease deposit, time and termination date, etc. of other tenants, the details thereof shall be stated in the confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage. Therefore, if a broker intentionally or negligently violates such obligation and causes property damage to a lessee, he/she is liable for compensation pursuant to Article 30 of the Licensed Real Estate Agents Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Da63857, Jan. 26, 2012).

arrow