Seoul High Court 2012Na33022 ( October 18, 2012)

(C) a fraudulent act by which the existence of a claim is sufficiently predicted and is not in arrears.

(C) In light of the above, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the gift contract was concluded as a part of the division of property, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the gift contract was concluded as a part of the division of property.

2012Da202703 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Korea

Chapter AA

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na33022 Decided October 18, 2012

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the assertion on the grounds of appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final