logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.23 2012고단2935
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant bears the obligation equivalent to KRW 200 million on August 2010, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the borrowed money or to pay the transferred money normally even if he/she borrows money from the victims or takes out the fraternity because the operation status of the “C pharmacy” operated by the Defendant is not good.

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. On July 2010, the Defendant: “Around July 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “it is necessary to bring a lawsuit against the inherited land, which is the litigation cost in the process of rendering a trial and rendering a judgment. When only the judgment is completed, he/she shall be paid immediately,” and he/she obtained a total of KRW 17 times from August 2, 2010 to February 10, 2012 from the victim to the victim’s total of KRW 100 million.

B. Around May 15, 201, the Defendant: (a) falsely stating that “A pharmacy operated by the Defendant in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government entered 10 million won per month from the Insurance Corporation; (b) the Defendant: (c) there is no problem in the payment of the fraternity; (d) the Defendant opened a 7-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-6-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-half-one-one-one-half-one-one-half-one-one-half-one-one-one-half-one-half-one-half-one-half-one-one-half-one-one-year-half.

2. Crimes against victim F;

A. On December 14, 2011, the Defendant, at around 16:00 on December 14, 2011, concluded that “C pharmacy operation funds are to be repaid by telephone to the victim,” and that it was obtained by deceiving the victim from the victim, namely, from the victim’s seat to the bank account in the name of the Defendant.

B. The Defendant around March 9, 2012.

arrow