logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 04. 13. 선고 2017다204155 판결
(심리불속행) 채권양도금지특약에 있어서 파산관재인은 제3자에 해당하며, 악의여부도 총파산채권자 기준으로 판단하여야 함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2016Na2049038 ( December 22, 2016)

Title

(In the special agreement prohibiting the assignment of claims, the trustee in bankruptcy is a third party, and whether it is malicious or not shall be determined on the basis of the total bankruptcy creditor.

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) In the special agreement prohibiting the assignment of claims, the trustee in bankruptcy falls under a third party, and whether the trustee in bankruptcy is in bad faith shall be determined based on the total bankruptcy creditor, so it is insufficient to deem that there is gross negligence

Related statutes

Article 449 of the Civil Act

Cases

2017Da204155 Other (money)

Plaintiff-Appellant

Korea

Defendant-Appellee

주식회사 ○○○○○○의 파산관재인 ●●●●●●

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court 2016Na2049038

Imposition of Judgment

April 13, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow