A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the actual operator of (1) C’s representative director’s interest (1)D.

The Defendant (State) has reached approximately five billion won the obligation of C, and the account was seized to obtain any additional loan under the name of C, and (1) has received any loan through D, and (2) has the intention to forge the transaction agreement entered into by C in order to make the sales performance of D, as if D had been entered into.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the office of DD operated by the Defendant on the first and fourth floor of the Homan Gyeonggi-si, G, and the fourth floor of the F Hospital of the E Medical Foundation in the name of the medical corporation; (b) stored the above F Hospital with the seal of the representative director of the E Medical Foundation F Hospital; and (c) stored the food materials supply contract in the name of the E Medical Foundation F Hospital with the seal of the representative director of the E Medical Foundation F Hospital in the sleepner; (c) changed the name of B from the above contract to D representative H; and (d) printed out the above contract and affixed the seal of D representative director on the name of the said H.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of the food supply contract under the name of E Medical Foundation F Hospital in the name of E Medical Foundation F.

B. (Re) On February 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the first place in the foregoing D office; (b) in the said C Office with the official seal of the representative director of I attached to the said C Office; (c) in the name of the said C Office with the seal of the representative director of I attached to the said C Office; and (d) changed the name of the other party to the contract in the said contract into D; and (c) printed out the said contract after converting the name of the C into the name of the other party to the contract.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of goods contract under the name of I, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On February 4, 2016, the Defendant exercised the said investigation document at the foregoing D office, and at the same time, the Defendant exercised the forged material supply contract and the goods supply contract to K and the vice-branch L as if it were a document duly formed, as set out in paragraph 1.

3. Fraud.