The defendant shall be innocent.

The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant entered into a contract for vicarious sale with the private person (YAC) who enters into on August 1, 2013, and takes charge of the sale and lease of the buildings and buildings in Sejong Special Self-Governing City D and E.

1. On January 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered the leased contract form for the lease contract form for No. 310 of Sejong Special Self-Governing City D Special Self-Governing City D building on the first floor; (b) entered the lessee’s lawsuit in the lessee’s column for the lease contract form for No. 310 of Sejong Special Self-Governing City D building; (c) inserted the “F of Chungcheongnam-do; (d)” in the registration number column for the legal entity into “G” and “H and/or I” column; and then printed the form into the name “(state) I” column; and (d) affixed the seal of “I” voluntarily made on the side of the International Telecom.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the lease agreement under the name of the Iel, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, delivered the forged lease agreement to the person in charge of the name and influence of the said forged document as if it were the document duly formed.

However, in relation to the issuance of the tax invoice, the Defendant made a lease contract by making an assembly-type stamp upon request from K, the representative director of the J (e.g., the name of the donation, evidence record 62 pages) and then considered to have received K’s approval at the time.

The phrase is argued for the purpose of "....."

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged through each evidence duly adopted and investigated in this Court, evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone was proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt that the Defendant had a criminal intent to forge and exercise a lease agreement under the name of the J without authority as stated in the facts charged.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

The lease contract is several times at L or M request.