logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.08.12 2016노1448
특수협박등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced the defendant to the punishment (six months of imprisonment) is unfair because it is too unreasonable (the defendant and his defense counsel explicitly withdrawn his argument of mental and physical weakness on the first trial date of the court of first instance). 2. The judgment on the grounds for appeal of this case was examined; the defendant is aware of all the facts of the crime of this case; the defendant reflects his mistake; the victim of the special intimidation of this case was smoothly agreed; the defendant deposited KRW 500,000 for the police officer who suffered damage to the performance of official duties; and the defendant's family members and his neighbors want to dismiss the defendant's wife, etc. are recognized as favorable to the defendant.

However, each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant is deemed to have been sentenced to the lowest limit of the sentencing guidelines in consideration of the contents and methods of the crime, and there is no special change of circumstances that can reduce the sentence of the court below in the first instance trial, in order to protect the legitimate performance of the public duties of the State and to establish a sound social order, and there is the record that the defendant has been punished several times due to interference with the performance of his duties, etc., and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period due to interference with the performance of duties. Considering the various circumstances of the defendant, the court below appears to have sentenced the sentencing guidelines for the recommended sentencing [Interference with the performance of public duties, interference with the performance of official duties, interference with the performance of official duties, interference with the performance of official duties, interference with the performance of duties, interference with the performance of duties, etc., and considering the circumstances of the defendant, the circumstances and possibility of the defendant's age, the environment, the victim's motive and consequence of the crime of this case, various circumstances, etc.

arrow