The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant misjudgments the defendant, and that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim of the injury, the defendant repeatedly committed the crime of this case even though he had the record of punishment several times of the same crime during the repeated period, and the victim of the obstruction of duties did not receive any letter from the victim of the obstruction of duties. The sentence imposed by the court below is a type 1 crime (Obstruction of Duties) in the sentencing guidelines set by the Supreme Court sentencing Committee [the scope of recommended punishment] in the aggravated area (1 year to 3 years and 6 months] [the special aggravated person] in the aggravated area (two crimes (Obstruction of Duties) in the same type] [the scope of recommending punishment] in the second category of the same repeated crime [the scope of punishment] in the aggravated area (one year to 3 years and 6 months), the defendant's final punishment [the scope of punishment] in the same category [the number of years to 3 (Special Aggravationd Crime] in the same category] in the sentencing range of punishment [the majority of years to 1 to /3 (No one year to 2.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.