beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Larceny;
A. On August 6, 2014, at around 12:01, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim E, which was placed on the tables in the “D” located on the third floor in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with one cellular phone equivalent to KRW 900,000,000, at the market price of the victim E, which was located on the tables.
B. On August 24, 2014, around 15:00, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with one cell phone (one cell phone) an option, which is located in the second floor of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City FF, in the market price of the victim H located in GPC, in an amount of at least 8.50,000 won.
C. On August 26, 2014, around 06:10 on August 26, 2014, the Defendant, at the “JPC” located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, with one cellular phone equivalent to KRW 900,000,000, the market value of the Victim K, which was located on its calculation stand, was stolen.
2. Fraud;
A. From August 13, 2014 to 02:00 the following day from August 13, 2014, the Defendant used the PC using the NPC (NPC) operated by the victim M in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City M.
However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the user fee because he did not have any cash in the process of being provided with the PC using service by the victim and did not have any separate means of payment, such as credit card.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received the PC use service from the victim, and did not pay the fee equivalent to 12,500 won, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to that amount.
B. On August 25, 2014, from around 00:00 to around 10:00 of the same day, the Defendant used the PC while doing so as to pay the service charges at Qua located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City P, thereby paying the service charges.
However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to pay the user fee because he did not have any cash in the process of being provided with the PC using service by the victim and did not have any separate means of payment, such as credit card.
Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.