logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.04.21 2015가단243759
임대차보증금
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver the plaintiff to the plaintiff 117, 1901, Nam-gu, Incheon, and at the same time, 170,000.

Reasons

1. The following facts of recognition may be acknowledged by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4.

On May 16, 2009, the Plaintiff leased the lease deposit amount of KRW 140,00,000, and the lease deposit amount of KRW 1901,00,00,000 from the Jiro-ro, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, as well as the lease deposit amount of KRW 140,00,00 from July 11, 2009 to the Defendant.

B. On June 4, 2011, the Plaintiff and the Defendant increased the deposit for lease to KRW 170,000,000, and the term of lease was changed from July 30, 201 to July 30, 2013.

C. The above lease term was implicitly renewed after the expiration of the lease term. On June 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the deposit return upon the expiration of the lease term, as there was no intention to renew the lease term to the Defendant any longer.

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the renewed lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant terminated with the Plaintiff’s intention of refusing to renew the lease agreement around July 30, 2015, following the Plaintiff’s expression of intention of refusing to renew the lease.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay 170,000,000 won to the plaintiff as well as to receive 170,000,000 won of the lease deposit from the plaintiff, Nam-gu, Incheon.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow