The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. A factory laboratory;

A. The Defendant forged a private document using his/her own driver’s license to open and use a mobile phone from a mobile phone seller in his/her name.

On September 26, 2011, the Defendant entered “E” store located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government mobile phone sales business entity “E” as “CF Mapo GH” in the subscriber’s name column with a syllogic pen and entered “C” in the subscriber’s name, and entered “C” in the applicant/subscriber column and buyer column as “C” and carried out a private person next to the name.

In addition, the Defendant stated the “C” column as “C” in the written consent for the use of personal information, using the black pension, and carried out C’s private person next to the name.

In addition, from that time until October 18, 201, the Defendant provided a total of 16 pages, including a written application for subscription and a written consent for the use of personal information in the name of C, a private document pertaining to rights and obligations, in a total of six times, as stated in the list of offenses committed in the attached Table.

B. The Defendant exercised the aforementioned investigation document at each time and at each place as set forth in Paragraph 1.3 of the above Article, each of which was forged to the mobile phone sales store employees who knew of the forgery, respectively, and as if the written consent for the use of personal information was duly formed, the Defendant exercised each of the following events:

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, ① in the case of a hospital hospitalized by the victim, external telephone or mobile phone can be made available through public telephone or mobile phone, and facsimile call through original affairs: Provided, That the driver’s license attached to the application for subscription is determined by facsimile between agency and radio operator in writing.

(2) The victim did not lose the driver's license used in the opening of the mobile phone.

(3) If the witness I is not the subscriber himself.