A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 26, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against a driver) reaches the Korean church in front of the D cafeteria located in Gunsan-si C, Gunsan-si, where the victim E (tax 41) gets in front of the D cafeteria under the influence of alcohol and was driven by the victim E (tax 41) and was under the influence of alcohol on the roads before the Korean church located in the Gunsan-si, Gunsan-si.

The death shall be discarded.

In this regard, it is difficult to smoke tobacco while putting a bath "Woo", and the victim shall not have tobacco loaded in the taxi.

As stated, “The victim’s left hand gets a part of the victim’s neck, and was inflicted an injury on the victim’s face when drinking the victim’s face part and drinking the victim’s face, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment. In short, the victim did not have any wife in an open room.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

2. The Defendant damaged property by assaulting the victim E at the same date, time, and place as described in paragraph 1 at the same time and place as described in paragraph 1, thereby damaging the victim’s cab to have the size of the card owned by the victim, the size of the card, the size of the black box, and the width of the meter, and the vehicle repair cost of KRW 145,00,00.

3. On December 26, 2016, at around 14:50, the Defendant, as stated in paragraph 1, took a bath to the police box belonging to the Gunsan Police Station G commander of the Gunsan Police Station, sent out after receiving a report of E’s 112, as stated in paragraph 1, on the road of the Central church indicated in paragraph 1 of the same Article, saying, “The Habk ? Habk ? Habk ? Habk ? Habk ? Habk ? Habk ? Habk ? Habk?”

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A H statement;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes (No. 43-46 pages of investigation records) of damaged photographs (27-29 pages of investigation records), photograph 6, and one CD screen image;

1. Article 1 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Selection of Punishment.