logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고정932
폭행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 21, 2016, around 19:45, the victim D assaulted the Defendant, such as making the Defendant her husband at the time of representative flag from the first floor of the F church located in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, referring to the Defendant’s husband at the time of representative flag.

In the above date, at the above place, the defendant was assaulted by the victim D as mentioned above, and the victim's body was pushed down several times, and the victim's hair was invaded by the victim's body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A video file submitted by I - A CD (139 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (in relation to the statement of a witness at the F church J pastors);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order / [The defendant alleged that he did not engage in any act, such as going beyond his hands to the victim to injure the body of the victim D or to catch the victim's hair, etc. However, the police investigation conducted ① the defendant and the victim's Ha was in a conflict with each other, and breath Ha was in a line with each other.

The statement (66 pages of the investigation record), the victim's body in the police investigation and this court that the defendant was pushed down.

In particular, in the police investigation, the police investigation stated that “A person who had been at the time of making the Defendant’s body was faced with his body, but later, he was aware that he had been JWed.

The statement was made with the content of "(98 pages of the investigation record)," and the J Ba also had the victim's body at the time of the police investigation.

The statement is consistent with the victim's statement(110 pages of investigation records).

arrow