logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.10.12 2018고정170
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendants’ acquittal

Reasons

The Defendants, around early 2015, proposed the proposal that the Defendants of the public corporation’s office “finites” from Russia and the Central Asian Commercial Women’s Supply Plan (Lussia, 1 year suspended sentence of imprisonment on November 14, 2017, 3 years suspended sentence of 1 year, 11 November 22 of the same year, 201), “finites” as well as “finites” to the domestic sexual traffic owners.

Therefore, the Defendants sent the Defendant’s photograph to Defendant B, who is scheduled to enter the Republic of Korea, ask whether or not the Defendants sent the above photograph to the domestic sexual traffic business owners, such as D, E, F, G, and H, and asked whether or not to employ the said female sexual traffic. If the business owners are determined to employ the female sexual traffic, they shall again send it to C and have C enter the Republic of Korea, and then have C take the job of sexual traffic, and then have the said business owners enter the Republic of Korea. In return, the Defendants received KRW 1.5 million from the owner of the sexual traffic, a single female of the sexual traffic, who entered the Republic of Korea, to transfer it to the Defendant B I and the K account in the name of Defendant B, and the Defendant’s employees, and transferred it to C. The Defendants received KRW 1.50,000,000 from the owner of the sexual traffic to transfer the said female sexual traffic in return for each time the said female would have transferred the said KRW 80,000,000 to the rest of the Defendants.

In such a way, the Defendants, from September 5, 2015 to March 9, 2016, through the same method, recruited 10 sexual traffic women over 426 times in total, and received 375,480,000 won in total from around 5, 201 to around 200.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to invite people to engage in the conduct of selling sex and received compensation therefor.

Maz.

1. Before March 6, 2015, the Defendants’ previous convictions and Defendants were “from March 6, 2015 to March 2016.”

arrow