1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The phrase "the calculation table of the amount of damages" in Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase "the calculation table of the expenses for future care" and "the calculation table of the expenses for future care" in Section 8 shall be replaced by the corresponding table.

Each 4th 6th 6th th son of the first instance court's decision "the result of the commission of physical examinations to the chief of the KatoTol University in this court" shall be construed as "the result of the commission of physical examinations to the chief of the Katol University in the first instance."

The fourth, fourth, and nine of the judgments of the first instance court shall be conducted as follows.

The plaintiff asserts that the labor ability of 15% was lost due to the scams and scambal changes on the side side. However, the method of calculating the labor ability loss rate under the Enforcement Decree of the State Compensation Act provides without subdividing the grade for the limited type of compensation treatment only in a specific field, such as the State Compensation Act. Above all, the labor ability loss rate cannot be acknowledged on the basis of this, because it is unreasonable that the degree of disability is abstract and the degree of disability is too large. Therefore, it is difficult to believe some of the results of physical evaluation of the Samsung Seoul Hospital Head of the court's physical evaluation of the Samsung Seoul Hospital Head of this court, which recognized the scambaling injury based on this, and it is difficult to conclude that some of the results of the physical evaluation of the Samsungnam Hospital Head of this court's physical disability still remains a trace of the appearance that can be evaluated as the physical disability even after the plaintiff received the anti-scambaling scambal., and it is difficult to view that the plaintiff's labor ability was lost due to reflect.