1. All plaintiffs' lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of the Japanese occupation occupation, I residing in the above H in the land survey division of KRW 1,278 G in Suwon-gun (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”) and KRW 1,278 (hereinafter “the mother land of this case”), which was prepared at the time of the Japanese occupation occupation.

2.27. It shall be written as being examined; and

B. On August 2, 1939, registration of preservation of ownership was completed on the following occasions: ① J 136 square meters, ② K 874 square meters, ③ L land 155 square meters, ④ M 113 square meters, and the Plaintiff’s attached land was completed: ① J 136 square meters, ② K 874 square meters, ③ 113 square meters, respectively.

C. The above JJ 136 square meters, ② 874 square meters before K, and ③ 113 square meters before M were land in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, P, Q or R, following the change of administrative district name, land category, and conversion of area into the unit of area. The above L land was unregistered and unregistered on December 7, 2007, without being registered on the land cadastre, and the land was restored to the land register of 512 square meters at Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the above land was corrected to 48 square meters on December 15, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”). D. D. F. road 488 square meters

On March 1, 1935, T which had lived with the permanent domicile in the Suwon-gun S, Gyeonggi-do, was deceased on March 1, 1935, and N, as the Australian inheritor, succeeded to the N's property as the family heir. On February 20, 1979, N's spouse U succeeded to the N's 6/25 shares, the 1/25 shares, the 1/25 shares, the 6/25 shares, the 6/25 shares, the 6/25 shares, the 4/25 shares, and the 4/25 shares, respectively.

U’s death on February 27, 2005 and the plaintiffs inherit 1/5 shares of U, and the final inheritance shares of N’s property are 11/125 of Plaintiff A, 26/125 of Plaintiff B, 36/125 of Plaintiff C, D, and E, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1 through 5 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In the absence of counter-proof such as the change of the content by the judgment, the person who was registered as the owner of the land investigation division for the causes of the plaintiffs' claims shall be considered as the owner of the land.