beta
Text
1. The attached appraisal map connects each point of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 3, in sequence, of 519 square meters prior to the wife population D.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 8, 1918, the networkO and P completed the registration of ownership transfer for each one-half portion of 519 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) prior to the wife population D on December 8, 1918. Q completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the instant land on November 27, 2007 due to inheritance on February 18, 1926. The Plaintiffs purchased Q’s shares and completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the instant land on October 23, 2018 on October 16, 2018.
B. The O died on March 8, 1963, and R, who was an son, died on July 28, 1945, prior to the death of July 28, 1945. As such, the O’s property was jointly inherited by R’s wife S and H, and U on September 9, 2002 (the shares of inheritance 4: 6: 1) and C and U jointly inherited the property (the shares of inheritance 1:1) on December 8, 201, T and deceased on December 8, 201 and jointly inherited the property by the designated parties E, the designated parties, G, H, the Defendant (designated parties), the designated parties (the shares of inheritance 3:2:2:22), and U.S. died on March 3, 2011, and T and U jointly inherited the property (the shares of inheritance 1:1).
Inheritance 1: 1: 1: 1
(C) At present, the land of this case is currently owned by the plaintiffs 1/4 shares, the designated parties E, the designated parties F, G, H, Defendant (Appointed Party), and I, respectively, 80/1,430 shares, the designated parties J, K, L, L, M, M, and N, each 39/1,430 shares. [The evidence No. 1, E’s each entry in the evidence No. 1, No. 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.]
2. In addition to the fact that the Defendant (Appointed Party) did not agree to the in-kind division method presented by the Plaintiff as follows, the Plaintiffs, co-owners of the instant land, as co-owners of the instant land, may file a claim against the Defendant (Appointed Party) who is another co-owner and the designated parties for the partition of the instant land jointly owned by the court pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act.
The defendant (Appointed Party) means the division of goods offered by the plaintiffs for the benefit of the plaintiffs.