A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a brain wave equipment development company with the trade name called “(State)D” in Daegu-gu C Building 404.

Any person who intends to conduct workplace skill development training for which workers are eligible to receive subsidies or loans for training costs shall obtain recognition from the Minister of Employment and Labor for the relevant workplace skill development training course, and any person eligible to receive subsidies for workplace skill development training for workers shall be an insured worker falling under each subparagraph of Article 43 (1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Employment Insurance Act, who has worked for at least 10 days in the case

The Defendant, who was recognized by the Minister of Employment and Labor as a workplace skill development training course, divided the sales amount of the above training course into KRW 205 of the building E and KRW 2 (F): The Defendant entered into a contract that takes exclusive charge of the above workplace skill development training course with the Defendant, and, after concluding the contract that takes exclusive charge of the above workplace skill development training course, did not receive the cost of workplace skill development training from the Ministry of Employment and Labor to make a false application for a person who does not are eligible

On June 27, 2014, the Defendant subscribed to the employment insurance as if a trainee registered in the vocational ability development training process of “improvement of the sports activity ability using a tool or tool” had worked as a daily worker for at least ten (10) days from Company I located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City H, and subsequently, through an incorporated association F, registered as a trainee in the vocational ability training computer network (hhd.go.kr) of the injured Republic of Korea (Ministry of Employment and Labor) and applied for training costs of KRW 600,000 as training expenses, and the Defendant pretended that a person eligible to receive vocational ability development training for workers is eligible to receive an ordinary application.

However, the fact is that G that the defendant registered as a trainee has not worked in I Co., Ltd.