Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15 million.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five years for a period of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special quasi-rape) at the Seoul Western District Court, and five

6. 10. The judgment becomes final and conclusive and is currently under probation.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 24, 2016, at around 00:40, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the front door of the FMW car, a victim E-owner of the FM car, who was parked on the road in his/her own while drunk, by exposing the front door of the FM car, which is parked on the road; (b) destroyed the said MM vehicle by breaking the front door of the left door and back door by several times so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 99,028 can be reduced; and (c) continuously destroyed the front door of the HM passenger car, a victim G owner of the said MM vehicle, who is parked on the front of the said MM vehicle, by spreading the front door of the said MM vehicle and the rear door, so that the repair cost equivalent to KRW 8,93,925 is damaged.

2. On September 24, 2016, the Defendant was unable to keep the police officers at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph 1. on September 24, 2016, and upon reporting 112 that the Defendant auxiliary to the foregoing parked vehicles, the Defendant continued to stop the Defendant by accessing the International District of the Incheon Samsan Police Station, the Assistant J and K, etc., and to check the Defendant’s personal information.

Accordingly, the above slope J arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender, and then tried to board the Defendant at the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and the Defendant resisted against this resistance to the view that the Defendant “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y,” and the Defendant flicked on the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and assaulted the chests of the saidJ as far as possible, and continued to do so.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order and investigation duties by the police officer's 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Each written statement E, G, and L.