A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violence;

A. On March 30, 2017, around 22:20, the Defendant 22:20, left the victim D (son, 35 years of age) located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C with a view to making the victim take a bath while taking a bath without any particular reason, and knife the victim’s breath with his hand, and knife the victim’s buck.

The Defendant committed violence against the victim as above.

B. On May 5, 2017, around 04:20, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the exit of 275 New subway Station No. 275, a taxi driven by the victim F ( South, 54 years old) and arrived at the above place; (b) demanded the victim to reduce the taxi fee to the victim; (c) the victim was deprived of his/her desire to reject it; and (d) the victim was deprived of his/her face with the Defendant; and (e) the victim was frighted by the Defendant, and (e) the victim was frighted to the face of the victim by drinking.

The Defendant committed violence against the victim as above.

2. On March 30, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the second floor H level in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, G 2:20 on March 30, 2017, and reported 112 due to the commission of the crime as set forth in paragraph 1(a) of the same Article, the Defendant was asked by the police officers belonging to the Yangcheon Police Station I District of Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, who were called up after being asked by the J on the case, and took a brud, and took a bath to the J, and brud the body of the said J, and brud up the body of the saidJ in front of the said main point, and 3 times

In addition, the Defendant, around March 30, 2017, arrested the police officer J as a flagrant offender and arrived at the said police officer J, at around 22:40 on March 30, 2017, and at around 22:40, 1-A and the above contents were as follows: (a) and (b) 1-A; (c) and (d) 1-abricatedly, she was brud with the Defendant

As such, the Defendant assaulted the police officer to interfere with the legitimate execution of his duties concerning criminal investigations by J.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of the laws and regulations of K, L, D, and F

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and each Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.