Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B and A violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint assault) on May 28, 201, around 201, around 21:11, at the street in front of a restaurant located in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, the victim F (51 years old) was seated and obstructed the progress of the vehicle of the victim F (51 years old), and the victim was in dispute with the victim, on the ground that the victim assaulted himself, the Defendant A was able to fl up and flick and flick, and flick and flick face and flick face of the victim, and Defendant B was fleepd with the victim’s flick-gu, and Defendant A’s flick-type public prosecution, other than Defendant A’s friendship, was flicked with the flick-gu, and flicked with the victim’s flick and flicked with the victim’s flick.

Ultimately, the Defendants assaulted the victim jointly with the above G.

2. Defendant B interfered with Defendant B’s performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and on the ground that Defendant B’s police officers belonging to the Daejeon Taedung Police Station, Daejeon Police Station, who called up after being reported at the place of 112, prevented Defendant B from carrying the Defendant F, Defendant B’s face at one time, and Defendant B’s chest who continued to restrain himself.

In the end, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to 112 reporting process.

3. Defendant A’s interference with the performance of official duties of Defendant A was arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and on the grounds that the above B was arrested in the act of interference with the performance of official duties, Defendant A was able to take a bath at the time and place, and he was informed of the police officer’s position belonging to the Daejeon Seo-gu Police Station He called with the above I, who was called out with the said I, and was able to take a bath at the time and place one time at the right level of J by drinking.

In the end, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers related to 112 reporting process.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police statement made to I and J;

1. Reporting on the arrest of the case;

1. Attachment of a report on internal investigation (in-depth internal investigation) - CCTV photographs;

1. Investigation Report (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties)- 112 List of Reporting Cases;