Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 2, 2015, the Defendant injured the Defendant: (a) 301 G (24) of the Victim G (24 years) that passed a path in the front parking lot of the Do Government-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, on the ground that it is unbured and unbold; (b) shicked the body of the victim by hand on the ground that it was frighten; and (c) ring the victim’s face face, the Defendant her fright and sponsed the victim with approximately two weeks of chills that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On December 4, 2015, the Defendants interfered with the Defendants’ performance of their official duties at the “I” restaurant operated by Defendant B, the Government-si, the police officer J, upon receipt of a report from K outside the public prosecution, engage in an assault, such as a defect in investigating the details of the report by the police officer J called out upon the receipt of the report from K, and Defendant B, the police officer, upon the receipt of the report from the police officer J, committed an assault, and the Defendant B took a breath of the police officer J’s balth and pushed out, and the Defendant A took the face of the J as his hand while taking a bath to the police officerJ.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness J, L, and each legal statement of the witness M and K;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Side photographs of the victim's assault damage;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Photographss by capturing a black stuffe image;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on vehicle booms video CDs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.

B. Defendant B: Articles 136(1), 30(a), and 136(2) of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 30(a) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (defendant B)

1. Defendant A: The act of assaulting a person who was only on the road is very bad in the nature of crime, and the police officers performing official duties shall be hump and sexual harassment.