logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.09.12 2018고정565
지방재정법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall receive local subsidies by false application or other fraudulent means under the Local Finance Act.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, in collaboration with C on March 8, 2017, received subsidies from the local government of the competent Gu office within the scope of 2/3 of the remodeling construction cost, up to 18 million won, under Article 3 of the Ordinance on the Support for the Maintenance of Abandoned Houses in Busan Metropolitan City, on the condition that the lease period is at least three years for local students, low-income households, multi-household houses, apartment houses, etc., and the lease period is at least three years for old old-age households, multi-household houses, apartment houses, etc., under the condition that they are leased at a half of the market price in the vicinity of the monthly rent, up to the maximum of 18 million won.

B In applying for B, despite the absence of the hot-water heating construction among the details of the remodeling construction of the said housing, the said construction was implemented and evidentiary documents were submitted as if the remodeling construction was completed, and received a false application for KRW 2,124,720 out of the local financial subsidy of KRW 18 million.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with regard to C;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. An application for the agreement on the lease of the nests for the sunlight and the nests for the sunlight;

1. On-site photographs (related to the implementation of a flood control project) (hereinafter “on-site photographs”) (the Defendant believed that the Defendant filed an application for the lease of the entire 1st floor room of the instant house, including three floors of the instant house, and was unaware of the fact that it was included in the construction details, the Defendant did not know that there was a hot water heating construction work, as recorded in the instant facts charged, with C, and there was no intention to file a false application for the instant local financial subsidy.

The argument is asserted.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, in particular, in the application for the lease of the nese-Le-Le-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-Se-S

arrow