beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 245,987,496 as well as 5% per annum from May 12, 2012 to December 12, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) The Plaintiff concluded an insurance contract with the Ethyd Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Ethyd Co., Ltd.”) with respect to “building on the ground warehouse (hereinafter referred to as “instant warehouse”) owned by the Nonparty Company 270-2 at the time of residents living in North Korea, with the subject matter of insurance as the above warehouse and inventory assets; totaling KRW 653,295,600; total amount of insurance coverage (fire department) was KRW 653,295,600; and the insurance period was from September 1, 2011 to September 16, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “instant insurance contract”).
(2) After that, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Nonparty Company with the content that the subject matter of the instant insurance regarding the instant warehouse is the above warehouse building and inventory assets, the insurance amount (fire department) totaling KRW 160,000,000, and the insurance period from October 6, 201 to October 16, 2012 (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the content that the insurance period is from October 6, 201 to October 16, 201.
(3) The Plaintiff concluded an insurance contract (hereinafter “instant three insurance contract”) with the Nonparty Company as inventory assets stored in the instant warehouse, with the insurance coverage amount of KRW 201,719,980, with the insurance coverage amount of KRW 201,719,980, and with the insurance coverage period from November 28, 2011 to November 16, 28, 2012 (hereinafter “instant three insurance contracts”).
B. On December 28, 201, at the request of the non-party company at around 16:37, the Defendant: (a) set the entrance door of the strike warehouse near the wave warehouse connected to the warehouse of the instant case to be adjacent to the steel pole (hereinafter “instant work”); and (b) set fire to the warehouse of the instant case by setting fire to the work clothes and masts, etc. which were burned to the instant warehouse and kept in custody inside the instant warehouse, while the Defendant carried out the work of fixing the entrance door of the strike warehouse to be adjacent to the steel pole (hereinafter “the instant work”).
(hereinafter “instant fire”). C.
The warehouse building of this case is partially destroyed by the fire of this case.