1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 and the following day to the Plaintiff annually from September 7, 2011 to December 6, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 16, 201, at around 19:50 on July 16, 201, the Plaintiff sustained the left-hand slick section by exceeding the part on which the road was worn out in front of the 331 slick box, Geum-dong, Geum-dong, Geum-dong, Geum-dong, Gidong, Gidong, which was the 3

(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”). (b)

On July 16, 2011, the Plaintiff was in the emergency room of the East-gu Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”). On July 16, 201, the medical personnel in the emergency room of the Defendant hospital had the Plaintiff take photographs of the Plaintiff and removed foreign substances, such as asphalt sculptures on the left-hand bridge.

C. From 12:10 to 13:20 on July 17, 201, the Plaintiff undergone an operation to remove human ionoconium and foreign substance (hereinafter “instant operation”). At the time, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital used the pressure drum on the left side of the Plaintiff’s medical personnel, and the degree of pressure drums was 350 meters.

After the operation, the part attached to the left-hand bridge of the plaintiff was fixed.

After undergoing the above operation, the plaintiff worn an auxiliary tool on the left-hand bridge, was hospitalized in the defendant hospital from July 18, 201 to receive eating treatment, etc., and received physical therapy after removing the auxiliary equipment.

E. On July 19, 201, the Plaintiff was subject to a wood MI test conducted by the Defendant Hospital, and the progress was to be observed as there is a possibility of damage to the scopical scopic, and the Plaintiff was to undergo a scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic

As a result of the Maternology test conducted on August 10, 201 by the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, it was confirmed that the Korean medical personnel damaged the left-hand Maternal and Maternal Maternals.

Accordingly, from August 22, 2011, the Plaintiff started a probationary campaign in the rehabilitation department of the Defendant Hospital, and was released from the Defendant Hospital on September 7, 2011.

F. On January 19, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to a nearby examination by the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff’s Machine and Machine Machine is more than that of the Machine Machine.