logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.12.10 2012가합8909
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 95,659,454 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from February 23, 2011 to December 10, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 25, 2009, the Plaintiff: (a) received kidying and extracting surgery from urology due to urology; and (b) received urology surgery from around that time, and was in use of immunodeficiency medication; and (c) applied to C’s clinic operated by the Defendant on February 21, 201 on the ground of cather and right shoulder, and the right satum.

B. On February 21, 2011, the Defendant hospital limited the Plaintiff’s revolving and left-hand turn movement; the Defendant hospital confirmed the date and image of the Plaintiff as a result of the radiation examination; the CT shooting showed that there was an identification of the escape from the compact drive No. 4-5; and the Defendant hospital provided light physical therapy until February 23, 2011. (2) On February 23, 2011, the physical therapy of the Defendant hospital provided the Plaintiff with light physical therapy, and the Plaintiff provided the outpatient treatment at both sides of the Plaintiff.

3) On February 25, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an appeal with the Defendant Hospital that the images were 2 days by the treatment of spherings, etc., and the Defendant Hospital confirmed that the Plaintiff suffered 2 degrees of pictures from the Plaintiff’s launchings, etc., and conducted disinfection and sphering on the said images on the same day and on March 26, 201, and on March 28, 201, the Defendant Hospital issued a written request for medical examination and treatment to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s right to the right, etc. was verified, but the Defendant Hospital issued a written request for medical examination and treatment to the Plaintiff, and transferred to the Kangdong Hospital.

C. On March 4, 2011, the Plaintiff hospitalized in the Maddong heart hospital. From around that time to March 6, 2011, the medical personnel at the Maddong heart hospital provided anti-biological treatment to both of the Plaintiff’s visual parts, such as the Plaintiff’s visual parts, and the Plaintiff’s visual and chest radiation shooting conducted as part of the prosecutor before the surgery against the Plaintiff’s general anesthesia was conducted. However, the Plaintiff’s medical personnel at the Maddong heart hospital conducted the examination of cardio-ion and chest CT on March 7, 2011.

arrow