Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to three months of imprisonment with prison labor for an injury, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court on March 15, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence.

1. Around 09:00 on July 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol at the Goyang-dong, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, a residential area; (b) was under the influence of drinking with other persons; and (c) was under the call, the Defendant found the said Gowon’s office as the said Gowon’s office for the reason that the said Gowon’s office would be crypted from D (Nam, 51 years old); and (d) was under the influence of leaving approximately 40 minutes of the said D’s crypt, such as flafing, fluoring, fluoring, fluoring, fluoring, etc. with the left hand, thereby hindering the management of the Gowon’s crywon’s office.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, was arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with business affairs, etc., around 11:00 on the same day, and was transferred to the Punishment of Minor Offenses and waiting in the office of the Yongsan Police Station, and, while under the influence of alcohol, she slicked for about one hour, such as fright, fright, bitch fright, and fright, fright, and fright fright, fright of bitch, and fright, fright of bitch

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the statement of D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (a point of interference with business at the government office), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the amounts);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Even after the defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order completed a long term imprisonment, he/she has been sentenced two times to imprisonment with prison labor or three times to a fine for a crime related to violence, etc., and the execution of imprisonment has not been completed for a long time, and thus, committed the instant crime.

Meanwhile, the defendant agrees with the victim of the crime of interference with business.