logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.09.25 2014고단414
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The facts of the background are the chief of the Civil Labor Group E Headquarters, Defendant B, the chief of the dispute over metal labor union, and the chief of the dispute over the metal labor union, on the charge of unfair labor practices against G chief executive officer H, etc., at the Daejeon Regional Labor Organization and the Daejeon Regional Labor Management Agency. However, as the labor union wishes, Defendant A sent part of the suspected facts to the prosecution as non-prosecutions and sent them to the prosecution, and as the result, requested the interview of the chief of the branch office with the head of the branch office in the above Incheon Regional Labor Management Agency, and 20 persons such as G labor union members were gathered in the room of the above Incheon Regional Labor Organization.

2. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties was committed by assaulting on August 6, 2013, around 15:00 on the ground that: (a) the labor inspector of the Daejeon District Labor Agency in the Daejeon District of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, who is the labor inspector of the Daejeon District of the Daejeon District of Labor and Labor, explained the result of the above accusation by 7 to 8, among the union members, and the result of the above accusation was not expressed; (b) Defendant A expressed a desire to the aboveJ; and (c) Defendant A committed assaulting the aboveJ on three occasions at his/her hand when he/she am cream with the above J on the ground that he/she did not bring about the result of the above accusation; and (d) Defendant A interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the treatment of civil petitions by the labor inspector.

3. Defendant B’s obstruction of performance of official duties stated complaints at the same date, at the same place, and at the same time and place, on the result of handling the case by the said astronomical Branch Office, and the said astronomical Branch Office K (43 years old) discovered tobacco to smoke in the meeting room of the said astronomical Branch Office, saying, “A person who smokes tobacco in the room to smoke in the room”

Accordingly, the Defendant, with his face on the face of the above K, read, “I am my face,” and said K’s face “I am the L of the Ministry of Employment and Labor and the tobacco is not sprinked at this place,” and then I am back the door, which is a public object in the above conference room, and am unfolded with the door, which is a public object in the above conference room, and am up to the shoulder by hand with the knife the floor, and the knife the knife, which is a public object.

arrow