1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On March 2013, the Defendant is an educational foundation that establishes and operates C University. The Plaintiff sought to open documents, school knowledge, and environmental lectures, to show his/her proposal and curriculum and to make his/her lectures, and requested the Defendant to employ him/her as an instructor. However, the Defendant rejected the request.

Accordingly, in the first half of 2014, the Plaintiff applied for the establishment of a lecture and employment of instructors with the same content as D, who is the chief of the Defendant C University Department, but D rejected the Defendant’s C University on the ground that environmental-related departments and culture subjects are not established. In the second half of 2014, the Plaintiff submitted the documents to CJ President in the second half of 2014, and was also rejected.

The defendant does not have any record of giving public notice of the employment of professors or instructors, and according to the defendant's Cuniversity Instructor Management Rules, the plaintiff is a professor or instructor who has a master's degree or higher. The plaintiff is a final academic background graduate from the broadcasting

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s claim of this case is premised on the Defendant’s duty to open the course required by the Plaintiff and the obligation to employ the Plaintiff as an instructor. However, even based on the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, the Defendant did not pay a public notice of the appointment of professor or instructor, and the Defendant cannot find any grounds or evidence supporting the above obligation to the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.