1. The appeal against the instant counterclaim by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) Eul, which was additionally submitted at the court of first instance and lacks to reverse the facts acknowledged by the court of first instance, shall be rejected; (b) the plaintiff and the defendant newly constructed the instant house after March 15, 1993 and acquired the ownership thereof; and (b) the plaintiff and the defendant acquired the ownership thereof on or around January 16, 1994, "B., the father network of the plaintiff and the defendant acquired the ownership thereof by newly building the instant house on or around September 192, 192, after purchasing the instant house from the deceased and the site from the deceased on or around 1992, and after the death of the plaintiff, the plaintiff and the defendant purchased the instant house from the deceased on or around 2, 191 and completed the registration of the ownership thereof by applying Article 2 of the Civil Procedure Act to the plaintiff and the defendant on March 12, 194, 192."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's main claim is accepted as reasonable, and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals filed by the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) about the main claim of this case are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.