logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.07.14 2015나5739
가등기에 기한 본등기 청구
Text

All appeals filed by the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the principal office.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the judgment is used or added as follows.

2. 고쳐 쓰거나 추가하는 부분 제1심 판결문 이유 부분 제1의 가 (2)항 뒤에 ‘(3) 이 사건 부동산 매매 예약서(갑 제2호증) 제3조의 날짜 기재 부분 중 서기 壹九 기재 부분 아래에는 ’2015‘라고 기재되어 있고 그 위에 인장(K의 인장으로 보인다)이 날인되어 있으나, 서기 壹九 기재 부분 위에는 ’2013‘이 기재되어 있고 그 위에는 인장이 날인되어 있지 않다.’를 추가하고, 뒷부분의 (3), (4) 항을 각 (4), (5) 항으로 고친다.

The part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance stating that “No. 2” in subparagraph 1 of Article 1 of the Reasons for Recognition of Paragraph (a) of the former part of the judgment of the court of first instance stating that “No. 2” was “No. 2 [No. 2018, although Defendant B asserted that the aforementioned facts were altered by the Plaintiff, it was alleged that: (a) evidence No. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) Defendant B’s “the aforementioned “2013” in the part of the date of completion of the reservation; (c) was originally “2018”; and (d) was altered by the Plaintiff. In other words, it is recognized that the above Defendant stated “No. 5” in the part of the date of completion of the reservation (as stated in the

However, the following facts or circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the descriptions of No. 4-1, No. 2, and No. 7 as well as the overall purport of the arguments, i.e., (i) the deceased on Nov. 9, 2012 and paying monthly living expenses to the deceased K, his father before his death; and (ii) appears to have been actually involved in the transfer of ownership of the instant real estate as the condition of living together with the deceased K and the Plaintiff, and (iii) the deceased L is a full promise.

arrow