beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The head of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Attorney Han-hwan)
Conclusion of Pleadings
October 26, 2010
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2010Guhap9532 decided May 7, 2010
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
The Defendant’s imposition disposition of acquisition tax of KRW 18,112,980 against the Plaintiff on January 22, 2009 exceeds KRW 9,056,490, shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of this court's judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and this is cited as it is.
2. Conclusion
The judgment of the court of first instance must accept the plaintiff's claim. Therefore, it is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as there is no ground for appeal.
Judges Sung Pung-tae (Presiding Judge)