(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.02.19 2013고단1510

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.02.19 2013고단1510

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) was a person who is engaged in driving of CPoter Cargo, and around October 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol at 0.155% of alcohol level around 20:25 on October 16, 2013, and proceeded with the roads front of the Haak-Eup and the Hari-ri Park in the direction of the flow distance on the face of the sex.

At the same time, there is an intersection where the central line is installed, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle should not drive the motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and there was a duty of care not to imprison

Nevertheless, under the influence of drinking, the Defendant neglected to do so and was unable to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol, such as a fluorous and fluorous drinking, etc., the Defendant, by negligence, caused the victim D (the age of 37) under the influence of driving the central line on the fluor line, thereby causing the victim D (the age of 37) to drive the fluor in front of the said cargo. The Defendant, due to the shock, fluor of G flus that the victim F (the age of 41) driven by the signal fluor of the said car fluor, fluor of G flus that was driven by the victim F (the age of 41), fluor of the said car fluor of the said car, thereby causing the victim D to suffer the injury, such as the fluoral fluoral fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluoral, for about three weeks treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving the said cargo vehicle from the front day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the next day of the traffic alcohol concentration of 0.15%, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.15%, at the same time as the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual condition survey report, on-site photographs, and the driving of junating.

참조조문

-도로교통법

-특정범죄 가중처벌 등에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.05.01 2017고단191

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.04.21 2016고단1249

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.11.10 2014고단754

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.10.30 2013고단2664

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.01.17 2017고단2409