logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.09.29 2015고정1805
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From March 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract on June 20, 2014 with the authority to conclude a construction contract by changing lighting facilities installed in an apartment building in the Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu area into E in accordance with the high-efficiency E support project through D, on behalf of the above F apartment management office on behalf of C, on June 20, 2014.

On August 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concluded a contract with a staff member in charge of the above apartment management office using a computer installed therein for the purpose of exercising the authority to cancel the supply contract, even though not delegated by the above C; and (b) concluded a contract with a staff member of the above apartment management office for the purpose of exercising the authority to cancel the supply contract; (c) “B” supplied the above lighting equipment, which is a high-efficiency lighting device, so that A can smoothly perform the Korea-China support business; but (d) determined that B’s supply of lighting equipment is delayed and thus, the contract cannot be terminated by the agreement.

After stating “A”, “F apartment”, “ Address: Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City,” “B”, “B”, “Si-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government H, “mutual name”, “I”, and “representative C”, and then, the apartment management office G issued to the above apartment management office G a written agreement for termination of supply contract for high-efficiency lighting equipment E in the name of the forged C and exercised it.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as a private document, forged and used a supply contract termination agreement in the name of C, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and forged four times from that time to August 22, 2014 the above-mentioned contract termination agreement in the name of C without authority, and then deliver it to the employee belonging to the apartment management office, who is unaware of the fact.

arrow