logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.04.25 2014고단566
장물취득
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for one year, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

Seized evidence No. 29,31.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 566]

1. Defendant A

A. On January 24, 2014, at around 02:00, the Defendant purchased one cellular phone of the unclaimed gallon in the market price, which is the victim’s name and unclaimed, lost or stolen from H in front of the Seo-gu, Seosan apartment, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and acquired stolen at KRW 50,00,00, despite being aware that it is a stolen.

B. Around 02:00 on January 29, 2014, the Defendant purchased 3 mobile phone thallons from S3 to 95,000 even though he knows that it is a stolen property, at the same place, the market value of the victim’s name, who was lost or stolen from H, was not owned by the deceased.

C. From January 2014 to February 13, 2014, the Defendant acquired 29 mobile phones 3, etc., which were owned by the victim K, etc., who was lost or stolen from the taxi engineers in the street in the vicinity of the JJ clubs in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-si, and from the street in the vicinity of the street clubs in Yancheon-si, the Defendant acquired 5 million won, knowing that it was stolen.

2. Defendant B

A. On February 14, 2014, around 18:00 on February 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) knew of the fact that 50 cell phoness, such as galthal thalthal thalthal thalthal thalthma, owned by Defendant C at his own house of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (506); (b) around 8.5 million won, in the facts charged in the case of the 2014 Godan5666.

Of the total sum of the attached list of crimes in both paragraphs 2014 and 2014Kadan655, the term “acquisition and transfer method” had different descriptions of the purchase price of the same stolen. However, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the amount is “9 million won (the indictment in the case of 2014Kadan566)” and it was recognized as “within the extent that there is no hindrance to guaranteeing the defendant’s right to defense.”

purchase and acquisition of stolen goods.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place, shall transport from a person who has no name to China.

arrow